Update on Non-EU Players at OM: Where Do We Really Stand?

Friends, the question arises at every transfer window: is our Olympique de Marseille limited in terms of non-EU players? With rumors and regulatory changes, it's not always easy to see clearly. We suggest putting a bit of order into it, so we know exactly where we stand before imagining the next recruits.

The LFP quota and the new rule: welcome to the Samoa agreement

A little reminder for those who follow the saga from afar: in Ligue 1, each club is allowed four non-EU players, that is, without an EU passport or equivalent. But beware, not everyone is treated the same: players from certain African, Caribbean, or Pacific countries (the famous ACP nations) have benefited until now from the Kolpak ruling, thanks to the Cotonou agreement. However, this has been replaced, since November 2023, by the Samoa agreement. What does it change for us? Not much, as long as the papers are in order: these players still do not count in the LFP quota if their administrative situation is proper.

Are you following? The system remains advantageous for OM, who often have an eye on the African market.

Amir Murillo, Rowe, and others: who occupies a spot?

In the current squad, two names often make waves. First, Amir Murillo, the Panamanian full-back, who has neither a European passport nor a special status. To put it simply: he is the only one on the team to officially occupy a non-EU spot. One out of four, we're good.

And Jonathan Rowe? That's a bit of a trap. The player has dual Jamaican and British nationality. Since Brexit, the English are no longer EU citizens, but the LFP has decided not to count them as non-EU as long as everything is clear on the administrative side. The result: Rowe does not take up any spot in the quota, and we can sleep easy.

Recruitment: OM has room, but…

Good news: with only one spot occupied, we have room to maneuver in the next transfer window. Profiles from Africa, from Senegal to Cameroon, or even from Haiti, also do not count within the limit, as long as their situation complies with the Samoa agreement.

So, do we have the opportunity to try one or two nice moves outside the EU this summer? Yes, but caution is advised because each signing involves thoroughly checking the papers. An administrative hiccup, and the whole plan collapses! On the other hand, the temptation could be great to go for exotic talents, but be careful of the balance in the locker room and the overall sporting project. What do you think? Should we take this opportunity to diversify or stick to profiles already integrated into Europe?

Your opinion matters!

As always, we await your analyses and predictions in the comments: which non-EU players make you dream for OM? Does the current policy reassure you or does it seem too timid? Let's discuss together, friends!